7 THE ENTOMOLOGIST'S MONTHLY MAGAZINE: a 3/ CONDUCTED BY _ C. G. BAliEETT, F.E.S. W. W. FOWLER, M.A., F.L.S G. C. CHAMPION, F.Z.S. E. McLACIlLAN, F.E.S. J. W. DOUGLAS, F.E.S. E. SAUNDERS, F.L.S. LOED WALSINGHAM, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., &c. SECOND SEKIES-VOL. XII. [VOL. XXXVII.] " An attempt liad been made to show the impossibility of preventing in the long run the natural spread of insects, the futility of attempts at extermination of well established pests, and the folly of viewing with alarm matters that had been going on for thousands of years without very great hurt to human interests." — C. L. Maelatt {in Presidential Address to Assoc. Ee. Entomologists, 1899). LONDON: GUENET AND JACKSON (Me. Yak Vooest's Successoes), 1, PATERNOSTEE ROW. 1901. LONDON NAPIER, PRINTER, SEYMOUR STREET, EUSTON SQUARE, N.W. MDCCCCI. X\ve.ec"(r3 THE ENTOMOLOGIST'S MONTHLY MAGAZINE: SECOND SERIES-VOL. XII. [VOLUME XXXVII.] ADDITIONS, &c., TO THE LIST OP BRITISH COLEOPTEBA DURING 1899 AND 1900. BY PROF. T. HUDSON BEARE, B.Sc, F.B.S. In the December number of vol. xxxiv (1898) of this Magazine, Mr. Champion published an account of the additions, &c., to our list during 1898, and as several novelties have been recorded during the past two years, and disputed points in the synonymy of others have been cleared up, it appears advisable to summarize them into one article. Carahus nitens, L., var. niger, Semenow. — Taken by Mr. Donisthorpe in the New Forest in 1895 (Ent. Record, xi, p. 71). Anchomenus quadripunetatus, De Goer. — Hitherto this species has remained, doubtfully, in our catalogue on the authority of one specimen taken many years ago by Mr. Bold in Northumberland. Mr. Champion has taken it in numbers near Woking, under fallen pine needles (Ent Mo. Mag., xxxvi, pp. 202, 236). Harpalus latus, L., v. erythrocephalus, F. — Found in numbers by Mr. W. E. Sharp in North Wales (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxv, p. 159). I took it some years ago near Oban, and Dawson mentions it in his Geodephaga Britannica. Phytosus nigriventris, Chevr. — Canon Fowler, in Jiis Coleoptera of the British Islands (vol. ii, p. 170), expressed the opinion that probably this insect was identical with P. balticux, Kraatz. Mr. Champion states (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxv, p. 1) that it is a distinct species, and gives distinguishing characters; he mentions the Chesil Beach as its locality. Since his note was published it has been recorded from Flint- shire, and from Hoylake, and is no doubt as widely distributed as P. balticus. Diglotta siiiuatocollis, Muls. and Rey. — The only record of this insect given by Canon Fowler {op. cil., ii, p. 171) is Ireland. Mr. Champion has taken it in Sheppey (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxv, p. 265), and it has also been found at Weymouth and Altcar. Stichoglossa semirufa, Er. — Taken by Mr. Harwood near Colchester by beating oaks (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxv, p. 55), an interesting addition. Trogophlaeux anglicanus, sp. n., Sharp. — Taken in fair numbers by Mr. Keys and Dr. Cameron on the shores of a tidal stream at Plymoutli. It seems probable that this insect is identical with T. iinicolor, sp. n. (Fauvel), Sharp, from New Zealand, and that it has been introduced (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxvi, p. 232). Orocharea angustatus, Er. — A single specimen was taken about twelve years ago by Mr. Piffard at Leverstock Green, Herts, at roots of rushes, in a disused clay pit. It lias been recorded by Canon Fowler (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxvi, p. 286). NtJAKT, 1901. A [January, Oli/tru.i flaincornis, Sturm.— Tliis insect was introduced by Mr. Rye aa O. hel- veticus, Tourn., and stands under that name in our Catalogues, and in Canon Fowler's •work {op. cit , iii, p. 152) ; it has been taken at Catcrham, Sandown, &e. (Ent. Mo. Mag., XXXV, p. 159, and Ent. Record, xi, p. 136). Olibrns affinis, Sturm.— Taken by Mr. Newbery and by Mr. Champion ; has hitlierto been considered identical with O.particeps, Muls. (Ent. Record, xi, p. 137). Cercyon bifenestratus, Kiist.— Taken by Mr. Newbery at Deal in 1896. Perhaps confused in our collections with C. marinus, Thorns. (= aquaticus of British col- lections). (Ent. Record, xi, p. 265.) Lepfidia hrevipennis, Muls. — Mr. Newbery (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxt, p. 292) adduces evidence to show that as this Longicorn has been taken so often, and in such widely distributed localities, it may now be fairly considered acclimatised, and is therefore entitled to a place in our catalogue. Dinoderus minutus, F., D. pilifrons, Lesne, Stephanopachyss substriatus, Payk. — Mr. Donistliorpe states (Ent. Record, xii, p. 16) that these three species have all occurred in Great Britain (probably introduced), and have been eonfused under the one name of D. suhstriatua, Payk. Hypera elongata, Payk. — The old records of this species were incorrect or very doubtful, but a specimen was taken by me near Edinburgh (Ent. Record, xi, p. 334). Since my note in the Ent. Record, Mr. Dale has examined his insects standing under this name and found they were not U. elongata. The species, therefore, probably had not been taken in Great Britain before. Anthonomus rufux, Schon. — Taken by Mr. Bennett, and afterwards by me at Hastings, Fairlight (Eut. Record, xii, p. 159). Ceuthorrhynehus querceti, Gyll.^ — This insect has previously been confused with Ceuthorrhynchidius terminatus, Herbst. Mr. Champion says (Ent. Mo. Mag.,xxxv, p. 142) that it has been captured at Horning Fen by Mr. Brewer, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Eliiman ; it appears always to occur in marshy places. I'hytuhius miiricatus, Ch. Bris. — Mr. Champion states (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxv, p. 143) that this insect has hitherto probably done duty in our collections as P. quadrinodosus, Gyll. On the other hand, Rhinoncus denticollis, Gyll., must dis- appear from our catalogue, as it is really synonymous with Fhytobius quadrinodosus, Gyll., and has been incorrectly included under Rhinoncus. Aphthona nonstriata, Goeze, var. eenescens, Weise. — This variety has been taken in Wales by Messrs. Walker and Tomlin (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxv, p. 15). Aphthona herbigrada, Cuvt., var. ?. — Mr. Champion records (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxv, p. 211) the capture in Yorkshire by Mr. Chaster of an jsneous coloured variety of this species, having more elongate antennje in the males than the type. There are thus in the two years' work eleven undoubted additions to the catalogue, and three others which were doubtful have been con- firmed, while one name, Hhinoncus denticollis, disappears from the list. Hyfophlceus linearis, Fabr , which appeared as an addition to our list in Mr. Champion's list of 1898, has been taken by that gentleman at Woking, a new locality (Ent. Mo. Mag, xxxv, p. 117). '1 wo other interesting records are the captures in the New Forest (Ent. Record, xi, p. 340) of Tropideres sepicola. P., and Ernohius abietis, F. The former has hitherto rested on the single specimen taken by Mr. Plant Kini.] 3 at Buddon Wood, and Canon Fowler considered the latter doubtfully indigenous (Coleoptera Brit. Islands, vol. v, p. 193). Pacliyta seos- maculata, Linn., has also now been taken in two fresh localities in Scotland (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxvi, pp. 235, 287). It is perhaps worth noting that two old Stephensian difficulties have been cleared up in the identification of Anomala Donovani, Marsh., as Anomala irrorata, Blanchard, an American insect ; and of EumoJpiis Dillwynii, Steph., as Scelodonta nitidula, Balj, a common eastern species (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxv, p. 269). Richmond : December, 1900. ON THE COLEOPTERA OF THE FAROE ISLANDS. BY DB. O. M. REUTEB. In his interesting note on Coleoptera from Iceland and the Faroe Islands, in Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. xxxvi, pp. 253, &c , Dr. D. Sharp says that he has been able to find only ten species recorded from the Faroe Islands, found by Mr. Walker, 1890, and mentioned in the Entomolo- gist for that year, pp. 374 and 375. He then enumerates 29 species, found by Mr. Annandale. In Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift, 3 Esekke, 13 Bind, Dr. H. J. Hansen of Copenhagen has already (1881) published a Faunula Insectorum Faer(Bensium (pp. 229—278), in which are recorded 65 Coleoptera, 4 Neuroptera, 26 Hymenoptera, 15 Lepuhptera, 86 Diptera, 2 Orthoptera, and 6 Rhynchota. The following are the Coleoptera not enumerated by Dr. Sharp : — Bemlidium bipunctatum and bruxellense, PteroHichus nigrita and vitreus, Ca- lathus melanocephalm, Hi/droporus pubescens, Helophorus grancUs and aquaticus, Hydrobius limbatus, Megasternum boletophagum, Quedius umbrimts and boops, Othius falvipennis, Lathrobium fulvipenne , Stenus speculator and unicolor, Aleochara, lanuginosa and mcesta,AutaUa ptmcticollis, nomalotafiingi,elongatula and circellaris, Tachinus marginellus, Lesteva bicolor, Onialium depfanaticm and rivulare, Altageniia pellio, Simplocaria metallica, Aphodius afer, Niptiis crenatus, Anobium molle and domesticum, Enicmtis minutus, Cryptophagus scanicus, saginatus, dentatus, and n. sp. ?, Atomaria apicalis, Helodes minuta, Otiorrhynchus maurus, Bargnotus Schonherri, Tropiphorus niercurialis, Pissodes pini, Apion cruentalum,iiud. Gracilia minuta* The insects were mostly collected in 1863 — 1868 by Di". A. Bergh. The following nine species, enumerated by Dr. Sharp, are not mentioned in Dr. Hansen's list : — * AgubtM alpestris of Hansen is considered to be a variety of A. bipusitdatus. [Januarr, Amara aulica, Patrohus excavatus and axsimillx, Bembidium tihiale, Hydroporiis priieostriatus, Philonthus ceneus, Lesteva Sharpi, Dermestes lardarius, Chrysomela staphylea. In the publication of Mr. Walker there is only one additional species, Otiorrhynclius scahrosus. Tlius, at the present time at least 74 or 75 CoJcoptera* are known from the Faroe Islands. The species found before the collections were made by Mr. Annandale are mentioned also by W. Lundbeck in " Coleoptera et Hymenoptera Groenlandica " (Videnskabelige Med- delelser, 189G, pp. 196—251), and by G. Jacobson in " Insecta Novaja-Zemljensis," pp. 63 — 65 (Acta Acad. Scient. Petersb., 1898). Helsingfors : November 5th, 1900. ANDRENA HELVOLA, L., and AMBIGUA, Peekins. BY THE EEV. F. D. MORICE, M.A., F.E.S. In the middle of May last I took near Leatherhead a number of very fine and fresh Andrence (males and females) under circumstances which make it impossible for me to doubt that they all belong to one species. Among the males, however, are some which, according to received ideas, are unquestionable specimens of heJvoIa, L., having, together with the other characters of that species, a pretty distinct tooth at the base of the mandible. In others, on the contrary, this tooth is scarcely perceptible, and in some it completely disappears, so that they cannot be distinguished from the males of A. ambigua, Per- kins, as described by that author (Ent. Mo. Mag., .xxxi, p. 39). As to the females I can see no reason to doubt that all are specimens of helvola. Unless, therefore, some reliable structural difference other than that in the form of the ^ mandible can be pointed out between helvola, L., and amhir/ua, Perkins, it seems at least questionable whether the latter can be maintained as a distinct species. I do not venture to say that it is not so, but the matter seems to require further investi- gation. I understand that Mr. Perkins is at present out of England, or I should have submitted my specimens to him before publishing this note. Bath sexes of the bee abounded on Alliaria officinalis, which was the only plant I saw them visit. Brunswick, Woking : October, 1900. * Lesteva bicolor of Hansen is probably L. f>harpi. is»oi.] 5 TWO SAW-FLIES NEW TO BRITAIN. BY THE REV. F. D. MOKICE, M.A., F.E.S. Of the genus Tomostethus separated by Konow from Blennocampn, auctt., we have, according to Cameron (Mon. iv, p. 177), five British species. To these I can add two more — one taken by the Rev. A. Thornley (June, 1898) near Lincoln, the other by Mr. Alfred Beau- mont (August, 1900) at Appledore in Kent. Mr. Thorley's capture is T. gagathinus, Klg.,cf , Mr. Beaumont's is T. funereus^ Klg-, also a (^ . Both species are recorded in Konow's Catalogue from " Germania, Gallia, and Suecia." The chief distinguishing character of Tomostethus is the definition of the apical part of the mesosternum {prcBsterna) by a distinct im- pressed suture. Some of the species in it have a closed discoidal cell in the inferior wing, others none. Both the present species belong to the former of these groups, and are very nearly allied to each other. Their descriptions will be found on the same page (213) of " Hymenoptera Scandinavise," where 14, B. gagathina, follows 13, B. funerea. Both are black and shining, with dusky wings and yellow tibia?. Funereun has the femora and tarei also yellow, only its coxse and trochanters being black. In gagathinus the apices of the femora are yellow, but their bases black ; and the tarsi are fuscous. Gagathinus has also shorter and heavier looking antennse ; and its tempora are margined below, which is not the case in funeretis. (This last is a difficult character to see, but an important one for separating species in the JBlenno- campidce). Thomson further distinguishes gagathinun by its " almost interstitial " trans- verse marginal nervure. It might be called so in the specimen before me, but I must own I see very liitle difference as to the position of this nervure in the two species. Both insects have a well marked " horny spot " in the second cubital cell, so that neither of them can be identified with the species which Mr. Cameron formerly called micans, but now hrachycera. (That species is known to me only in his description). Woking : December, 1900. ACULEATE HYMENOPTERA IN DUMBARTONSHIRE. BY J. R. MALLOCn. During the last two seasons I have been collecting Hi/jnenoptera Aculeata in the Bonhill district, with the purpose of forming a list to be published next year in the Handbook that is to be issued to mark tTie Brit. Assoc. Meeting in Glasgow. Mr. Dalglish, of Glasgow, has 6 [Janiiavy, also been collecting the bees, and between us we have turned up quite a few good species, and some that are new to Scotland. My co-worker has been fully as successful as I ; and although we have had only the short space of two years to make up the list we have reached the total of 102 species, and may possibly find some few more additions with the assistance of friends or older records. Among the species that are w^orth noticing are the following : — Salius fuscus, Linn. — Not uncommon at Arrochar, Maj and June, 1899. S. parvulus, Dahlb. — This species was abundant at Levenside Moor in June, 1899, but was much scarcer tliis year ; it occurs with Andrena analis. Ceropales maculata, Fabr. — Levenside Moor, Bonhill, 1900, scarce. Crabro palmipeSjlAnn. — This species was very abundant, being even commoner than cribrarius, on the hillsides ; it was met with almost everywhere in sandy banks, C. varius, Lep. —Not so common as the preceding, but met with at Levenside Moor and Bonhill, 1899-1900. C. dimidiatm, Fab. — One specimen flying along an old wall on Dumbarton Road. J'espa atcstriaca, Panz. — Have taken this species at Bonhill, 1879, and possess a specimen taken near Paisley, 1899. Odynerus~trimarginatus, Zett.— This species occurred on an old wall on Leven- side Moor, Bonhill, in July and August, but was not common. Sphecodes hi/alitmtus, Schenck. — Jamestown and Bonhill, scarce. S. variegatus, Y. Hag. — Levenside Moor and Bonhill, scarce. Andrena fucata, Smith. — Occurred near Jamestown, not uncommonly, flying about hawthorn hedges at the end of May. A.fascipes, Kirby. — One S > 1899, and several "^ s, August, 1900, on Levenside Moor ; flying on the heath. A. analis, Panz. — A very common species ; burrowing in the moorland paths, Levenside Moor, &c. Nomada obtusifrons, Nyl. — One specimen, 1899, and several more, 1900, Leven- side Moor and Jamestown. N. borealis, Zett. — Scarce; one at sallows, 1899, and two more at dandelion flowers, 1900, Bonhill. Dillichip Terrace, Bonhill, N. B. : October 2Uh, 1900. ACULEATE HYMENOPTBRA IN THE WEST OF SCOTLAND. BT ANDREW ADIE DALOLISH, F.E.S. During the last two years, whenever the weather permitted, I have devoted a great amount of my time in collecting the Aculeata ; the principal object being to assist Mr. J. K. Malloch with the list which he is compiling for the occasion of the British Association's visit to Glasgow in 1901. It is an extremely interesting group, and I am afraid my favourite Order, the Lrpidoptera, has been somewhat neglected during these two years. 1901.] 7 To Mr. Edward ISauuders, F.L.S., I am indebted for the identi- ficatiou of the greater portion of my captures, all the specimens having gone through his hands. I have already had the occasion of personally thanking Mr. Saunders, when he spent an afternoon with me in Glasgow, but must also embrace this opportunity of again expressing my gratitude, not only for the identification of my captures, but for the very great interest which he has undoubtedly taken in the matter. The weather during these two seasons, as every one knows, has not been of the finest description, but full advantage was taken of the intervening fine days ; and I am not altogether displeased at the result. The following is a list of the principal captures : — Fompilus Ktiguicularis, Thorns.— One $ on flower heads of yarrow, King's Cross, Arran, August 18th. Oxyhelus uniglumin, Linn. — Several near Irvine, June 30th to July 22nd, on wild carrot. O. mandibularis, Dhlb. — Earo, near Irvine, July l-ith, on similar plant (three spocimens). Odynerus spinipes, Linn. — One S, Dundonald, July 14th. Mr. Anderson Fergusson also brought me from Barr 2 (J s and a ? . Prosopis brevicornis, Nyl. — One ^ and four ? s, Irvine. July 22nd. Halicius tumKlorum, Linn. — da very common at King's Cross, on knapweed, August 15th. Andrena Cetii, Sehr.--One $ swept from birch, and two ? s on scabious, Aug. 4th — 8th, at King's Cross. Nomada ochrostoma, Kirb. — One ? , Barr, Ayrshire, in 1898, Mr. Anderson Fergusson. N. Fabriciana, Linn. — One, King's Cross, August 13th, near burrows of Andrena Q-wynana. Epeolus productus, Thorns.— One specimen, Irvine Moor, July 8th, 1899 ; and another at same locality, July 22nd last ; this little species will doubtlessly be parasitic on Colletes montanus. I can find no previous Scotch record for any of the above. The following are rare in Scotland, but have all been recorded : — Fompilus xpissus, Schiodte. — One J , Dundonald, Ayrshire, July 14th. Crabro tibialis. Fab. — One S , Dundonald, swept from birch, July 14th. Colletes montanus, Mor. — This species, which I had the luck to add to the British list last year, and which was described by Mr. Saunders, ante vol. xxxv, p. 262, I again found this season very commonly from June 30th to July 22nd, at Irvine. Andrena cineraria, Linn. — One ? taken by the late Mr. Geo. W. Ord at Strathbano, June, 1899, and a S from Pirnmill Arran, June this year, by Mr. A. Fergusson. Nomada obtusifrons, Nyl. — One c? and five ? s at King's Cross, Arran, on August 13th, at a spot where Andrena coitana was abundant. Bombus Jonellus, Sm.— One ?, Irvine Moor, July 8th, 1899; Luss, June 2nd, [January, 1900; and King's Cross, August ISth. B. xoroensis, Fab. —One $ , Barr, Ayrshire, July, 18'J9; one (?, Kilkerran, September 15th, and $ s from Dundonald, July 14th ; and Kilsyth, September 8th this year. Mr, Anderson Fergusson has kindly permitted me to record the specimens taken by him. 21, Princess Street, Pollokshields : November, 1900. CORSICAN ANTS, &c. BY G. C. BIGNELL, F.E.S. Last summer (May to October, 1899) I spent in Corsica, and the greater part of the time 1 had lodgings in Ucciani, which is about 19 miles from Ajaccio, at an altitude of about 1250 feet ; it was in this district that the undermentioned insects were obtained. I am very much indebted to Mr. E. Saunders for naming the specimens. Camponotus maculatus, Fab. Leptothorax tuhervm, Fab. (r. athiops, Latr.). (r. Nylanderi, Foerst.). lateralis, Oliv. angttatulus, Nyl. pubescens, Fab. Myrmica rubra, Linn. Colobopsis truncata, Spin. (r. scabrinodix, Nyl.). Lasius emarginatus, Olir. Cardiocondyla sp. 1 $ . fiavus, De Gear. Ajjhcenoy aster barhara, Linn. Playiolepis pygmcea, Latr. testaceopilosa, Luc. Bothriomyrmex meridional is, Roger. Pheidole megacephala. Fab. Tapinoma erralieum, Latr. SoJenopsis fugax, Latr. Cremasiog aster gcutellaris, Oliv. The large species of the above began to sestivate in June and remained in that condition until the rains appeared in September, the smaller species were obtained by beatinir, mostly from Arhufns, which is the prevailing shrub uf the island. It may be also interesting to note that on May 11th and following days I observed Aplicenocjaster testaceopilosa in several localities robbing weaker nests of their pupjE, I presume to strengthen their own,^as do Formica rufa and Myrmica rubra in England. I also obtained two species of Mutilla, viz., maura and viduata, and three of Scolia ; S.Jlavifrons, Fab , was abundant on the flowers of a large thistle at Campoloro, near Ajaccio, two or three often occurring on one flower ; the other two I captured were smaller species, viz., qiuidripunctata and unifasciata. Saltash : September lOth, 1900. 1901.] 9 NOTES ON BKITISH TRYPETIDM, WITH ADDITIONS TO THE LIST. BY KALPH C. BRADLEY. Records of Trypetidce appear so seldom, and the insects are, with one or two exceptions, so uncommon, that a few remarks about them may prove acceptable, especially, as during the last season, several interesting species have been taken. The additions. Tephritis {Oxyna) elongatula, Lw., a pair swept in a field at Swanage, August 29th. T. ruralis, Lw., one ? taken June 29th, 1898, New Forest. The next two, although not in the list, have been exhibited and recorded by myself. RhacochlcBna toxoneura, Lw., one ? on window, Sutton Coldfield, May 22nd, 1897 ; this has not apparently been taketa again. Tephritis tessellata, Lw., one $ taken in July, 1894, New Forest ; Mr. Wainwright and myself came across this species on a visit to West Runton, Norfolk ; seven specimens. In the same district we found Trypeta cornuta, F., commonly on the heads of a Centaurea ; it is a lovely green insect when alive, but unfortunately fades to a dirty drab when dead — this was new to us. T. tussilaginis, P., and T. bardance, Schrk., were fairly common, and Mr. Wainwright was lucky enough to get a (J Spilographa alternata, Fin. Urophora solstitialis, L., occurred ; and Tephritis vespertina, Lw., and Sphe- nella marginata, Fin., were common. Ensina sonchi, L., fell to the sweeping net, and I also met with it at Bourne- mouth, and later on two specimens on sunflowers in my garden at Moseley. Urellia stellata, Fues., a few at West Runton, I afterwards found it more commonly at Bournemouth, and, like the previous species, found it in a field a few days later close to my house. These two are recorded, I believe, for the first time in the Midlands. Urellia eluta, Mg. : this is in italics in Mr. Verrall's list. Mr. Wainwright took a single ? at West Runton, and he has also met with Trypeta onotrophes at Selsby and Sutton Coldfield. Tephritis absinthii, F., three specimens of this fell to my share at Bourne- mouth in August (two males, one female). The genus Carphotricha seems very rare ; last year I captured a J guttulans, Mg., in my garden, July 26th, 1899, and this year Mr. Martineau swept a $ pupil- lata, Fin., at Solihull. Many of these little gems used only to be obtained by systematic sweeping, and it behoves one when examining the contents of the net not to throw the debris away hastily, as the little creatures seem stunned, and it is frequently four or five minutes before some of them recover suflBciently to crawl up the net. Coleopterists must come across these little spotted and banded winged flies in their sweeping excursions, and I should be glad if any collectors would kindly forward them to me, by this means increasing our knowledge of the distribution of this interesting group, and possibly adding to our list. Lyndhurst, Mayfield Road, Moseley, Birmingham : Decembtr, 1900. 10 [January, ATHERIX CRASSIPES, Meio. : A NEW BRITISH DIPTERaN. BY n. W. ANDKEWS, F.E.S. While collecting in July last near Ticehurst in Sussex, I took half a dozen specimens of a Dipteron which Mr. Verrall has since kindly identified for me as Atherix crassipes, Meig., an addition to the British list ; he also tells me that there are only a few European records for this species. My specimens were taken flying among some small alder bushes on the banks of the River Rother, and had I known what it was I was catching, I could have taken a considerably longer series, as it was not at all uncommon in that particular locality. 9, Victoria Road, Eltham : November, 1900. Merodon equestris. Fab. — It may be of some interest to note that I found in a newly erected house near Saltash thirteen dead specimens of Merodon equestris, six S and seven $ ; on making enquiries I ascertained that the owner had purchased at a sale room in the town a parcel of imported bulbs, that he deposited them in a glass cupboard for a time ; while there the larvae left the bulbs, turned to pupse, and the flies duly emerged. Not knowing this Dipterous fly, I sent them to Mr. Coryndon Matthews for identification ; he kindly named them, and remarked that he had taken several specimens in his garden at Ernie Wood, near Ivybridge, mostly in one season, and that they varied in colour as much as those I found. These flies are thickly covered with short stiff hairs on the thorax and abdomen, and may be mistaken for small bumble-bees ; four represent in colour Bombus venustus, and one a $ lapponicus, the other eight are rather mixed in colours for good comparison, for no two are quite alike.— G. C. Bignell, Home Park Road, Saltash, Cornwall: November \2th, 19U0. Correction concerning Erebia glacialis. — I should like to correct a couple of lines on p. 292, vol. xxxvi. What I believe I said was that the insects shown were very close to the form called melas from Campiglio. This was at one time supposed to be melas, but was proved by Calberla to be glacialis. — T. A. Chapman, Betula, Reigate : December 3rd, 1900. Notes on Lepidoptera from Staffordshire. — I have taken one specimen of Vanessa C-album here this season ; it is a great rarity in these parts. Of Colias Edusa I have seen one. Acherontia Atropos has been plentiful in the larva state. Macro- glossa stellatarum has occurred all through the summer ; I took the last at rest in my hall on October 22nd. On July 22iid I took at light a nice specimen of Xylophasia scolopacina ; it is, I believe, the second ever taken in the county. On August 19th I captured one Apamea fibrosa at sugar, being the second that I have secured here. I have found this year that Hadena contigua feeds on larch in the wild state ; Mr. Woodforde beat one larva from it last year, but we both thought that the larva had fallen from an overhanging birch ; I beat out two this year, very late in the season, from an entirely isolated small larch. — Richard Freer, Church Street, Rugeley, Staffordshire: November, 1900. 1901. J 11 Leucania vitellina, L. oXhipuncta , Laphijgma exigua, Heliothis armigera, ^c, in South Devon. — On August 24th last I left home to have nearly three weeks in South Devon, in company with my friend Mr. J. Jiiger, of London. Our special object was to take Leucania vitellina, L. albipuncta, and Laphygma exigua. A South Devon friend had suggested a locality which he thought would be likely to produce these species, though that particular bit of ground had never previously been sugared ; and during our stay he frequently joined us in our work. Unfortunately the season was a late one, and the best work was done after I left on September 12th. Mr. Jager remained acme days after me, and our friend continued to sugar into the early days of October. Of the three species only L. albipuncta seemed to be out at the time of our arrival, and of it I took one the first time I sugared, on August 25th. One night the following week, the only nigiit during my stay in which the atmospheric conditions were really satisfactory, I took five, but it was tlie sole occasion on which more than odd specimens occurred to us. L. exigua I did not take until the end of our second week, but a few days after I left Mr. Jiiger captured as many as five one evening ; and still later it occurred even more freely to our friend. L. vitellina did not turn up at all during my stay, but Mr. Jager was fortunate enough to take it a few days later, and from that time to the first week in October a fair number were captured, mostly in fine condition, and one of them " as red as the red form of albipuncta." Thanks to the generosity of my friend, a nice representative set of it, as well as of L. exigua, now grace my own cabinet. L. vitellina comes early to sugar, almost as soon as dusk comes on ; it is very skittish, and requires careful boxing. Our experience with L. exigua was altogether contrary to Mr. Woodforde's ('■/. Barrett's British Moths, vol. v, p. 274). With us it also came early, and was practically over by 9 o'clock ; and it only came in numbers on calm, dark, warm nights, being scarcely seen during strong wind, or late, the latter being the condition in wliich Mr. Woodforde took it. But, unlike L. vitellina, when once on the sugar there is no further trouble with it, as it sits perfectly quiet, and will not be frightened off. It deposits its eggs freely, and Mr. Jager, our friend, and myself, all now have larvse feeding from the captured moths. During this time, too, a few fine Heliothis armigera occurred, and probably it has not often happened to one collector to take L. vitellina, L. albipuncta, L. exigua, and H. armigera on one — and the first — " round " of his sugar, as occurred to our friend on September 16th ! To proceed to more ordinary species, Colias Edusa was abundant everywhere on the many miles of coast we explored, and any number might have been taken ; a few of its variety, Helice, occurred with it, but of C. Hyale we never saw a specimen, though we con- stantly kept a sharp look out for it. The other butterflies included a single late Argynnis Paphia, Vanessa lo, Atalanta, and cardui, in plenty ; and Lyccena agestis, alexis, argiolus, and Adonis in smaller numbers. Macroglossa stellatarum flew about flowers, but was scarce ; CalUgenia miniata and Lithosia caniola occurred, but the latter, although it had been unusually common in the district, was then practically over. The same remark applies to Leucania putrescens, though it turned up still in fine condition at ray sugar on August 25th. Stilbia anojyiala was plentiful in one spot, and of it quite a number of females were taken at sugar, but singularly not a single male appeared at the sweets, though on the wing common enough. One of the most abundant Noctuoe was certainly Caradrina am'iigua, which continued, and in good condition, all through our visit. A fine form of Noctua neglecta was fairly \2 [January, common ; and a single large female Aplecta occulta was taken. Bryophila glandifera was still not uncommon on walls, and had previously been very plentiful and vari- able. Other Noctu(B included Hydrxcia nictitans, Heliophohus popularis (very dark), Miana furuncida, Agrotis puta, segetum, and saucia, all in fine variety, A. suffasa, TryvhcBna fimbria, Noctua glareosa, N. rubi, Cosmia diffinis, C. affinis, Folia chi, P. JlavociTicta, Epunda lichenea, E. lutulenta, and Plusia festucce. The numbers of second brood specimens of Acronycta rumicis, Mamestra hrassicae, Hadena nle- racea, &c., were, to a northerner, a striking feature. A single Thyatira batis occurred on September 8th, probably also a second brood specimen. Of Geometnv, one of the most noticeable, from its abundance, was Acidalia promutata : it occurred commonly on walls wherever we went, and as we sat in our sitting room with open windows, after we came in at night, was constantly about our large lamp, and in greater plenty than any other species. Melanippe yaliata nearly equalled it in numbers, followed by Eubolia bipunctaria and Anaitis plagiata. Other species were Acidalia subscri- ceaia, Aspilates citraria, Eupithecia centaureata, E. pumilata (plentiful at sugar), Melanippe rivata, Phibalapterya lijnata, &c. Before our arrival several Anticlea sinuata had been taken, surely making a new locality (if not county) for this local species. The smaller moths included Spilodes sticticalis, Scopxda ferrugalis, in abundance, Scoparia angustea, Phycis carbonariella, Crambus geniciilellus, &c. A good variety of the genus Depressaria also came to the sugar, among which AlstroB- meriella, rotundella, and Douglasella were noticed. Some time was devoted to other Orders, and among the dragon-flies, the in- teresting ^schna mixta was plentiful in one spot of marshy ground, having a wide stream running through it. But although Mr. Jiiger and myself spent a good por- tion of one fine morning over it, and when we frequently saw four or five at one time, neither of us managed to catch one, nor did we ever see one settle. The only one secured, a fine specimen, was taken by a boy and brought to us. On the same ground Sympeirum sirinlatum was abundant, with a few Inchnura elegans. Odd specimens of one or two other species were seen on the wing, but their identity is doubtful. Of PloAiipennia and Trichop>tey a, Chrysopa flavifrons, C. vulgaris, C. aspersx, Limnophilus affinis, and L. lunatus were all common at sugar; by which means also the following five species of Orthoptera were attracted. Forficula auri- cularia in pi-ofusion as usual ; Leptophyes functatissima, common ; Locusta viridis- sima, fairly so ; Meconema varimn and Ectobia Panzeri, several of each ; Stenobothrus hicolor and S. parallelus were both abundant ; and Xiphidium dorsale was not un- common in the marsh previously referred to. Of Diptera, a pair of the fine Asilus crabroniformis were captured.— Geo. T. Poreitt, Crosland Hall, near Huddersfield : November 10th, 1900. Lepidoptera in Anglesea. — I spent my holiday this year about two miles from Holyhead. During my stay, June 2l8t to July 10th, the weather was most incle- ment ; I cannot imagine a worse three weeks for the time of the year. It rained nearly every day, accompanied by a stiff S.W. breeze ; so the following list is by no means indicative of the resources of the locality. The night flyers were all taken at white campion, which was very abundant. I did no sugaring, for if there had been anything but stone walls to sugar, I am sure 1 should never have kept my lamp alight. ifloi.] 13 The following is a list of insects taken : — Lyccena Alexis (common everywhere), L. ^gon (very common in one locality), Chcerocampa porcellus (common), Sesia pJiila.nthiformis (locally plentiful), Dianthcecia capsincola and D. conspersa (buff forms), Caradrina morpheus, C. cuhicularis, Chariclea umbra, Hadena dentina, Cucul- lia umhratica (in swarms), Mawesira albicolon, Hecatera serena, Agrotis porphyrea, Noctua plecta, Melanippe galiata, Emmelesia decnlorata (large and strongly marked), EuhoUa, palumharia, Pseudoterpna pruinata {cytisaria), Acidalia promutaia, A. scutulata, Eupithecia venosata and E. nanata, Anaitis plagiata, Ennychia cingulata, Platyptilia ochrodactylus, Pempelia palumhella, HomcBosoma nebulella, and Phycis subornatella (very common). — KiCHABD Feeek, Church Street, Rugeley : Nov. 1900. Autumnal notes from Seaton, Devon. — About the third decade of October, I began to take steps for recording the latest dates on which certain species of insects could be found here this season. The following are some of the results of my observations : — October 25th. — Epinephile Janira, 1 oo. des Sciences Nat. de I'Ouest de la France," for 1899. These authors con- cluded that insects were captured only by immature flowers, the anther-wings in the cleft between which the proboscis of the insect is caught being at that time stiff and resistant ; but when the flowers are ripe the anther-wings become less rigid, and do not offer sufficient resistance to the withdrawal of the proboscis, which carries with it the pollinia ready to be transferred to the stigma of the next flower visited by the insect. Mr. Tutt, for the Rev. Mr. Burrows, a large series of Epiinda lutulenta from Mucking, in Essex, and made remarks upon several interesting variations in- cluded in the series. Mr. W. J. Kaye, Hydrocampa stagnalis, var., with examples of the typical form for comparison ; the variety differed in having the basal line 24 [January, nearly obsolete, and in other points. Mr. F. Merrifield, a variety of Argynnix Dia taken with a few examples of the ordinary form at Ilanz, in the Vorder Rhein valley early in September last, when what was, he believed, a third brood of this species was abutidant. Canon Fowler, a specimen of Orochares angustatus, Ericha., a Staphylinid beetle new to the British list, taken at Leverstock Green, Herts., by Mr. Albert PifEard. The Rev. F. D. Morice mentioned as a fact of some interest, that in a nest of Formica sanguinea at Weybridge, in which he found males and workers of that species, he found also males and females as well as workers of the &\tk\e-a.^\t, Formica fusca, an experience somewhat different to that of Huber and Darwin, who stated that workers only of the slave species were found in the nests of sanguinea. The Secretary read " Some notes on variations of Zeritis Thysbe, Linn.," communicated by Mr. H. L. L. Feltham, of Cape Town, and exhibited one female and two male specimens of one of the rare forms referred to in the paper. This form was originally noticed by Mr. Trimen as an " aberi-ation." Mr. Feltham suc- ceeded in taking several specimens on the summit of the mountains overlooking Minzenberg ; he requested that the specimens exhibited should be placed in the British Museum collection. — C. J. Gadan, Hon. Sec, TRICHOPTERA, NEUROPTERA-PLANIPENNIA, ODONATA, AND RHOPALOCERA COLLECTED IN NORWAY IN THE SUMMER OF 1900. BT KENNETH J. MORTON, F.E.S. The perusal of Dr. Chapman's interesting record of his journey in Norway during the summer of 1898 (Ent. Mo. Mag., 2nd ser., vol. X, pp. 20 — 28) resuscitated an old wish to see something of the insect fauna and the flora of Scandinavia, and I determined to visit that country the following summer. It was, however, too late in the season before I could arrange to get away, and it was therefore con- sidered advisable to postpone the visit for another year, perhaps not a misfortune, if there is anything in the theory of the biennial appearance of Erehia EmhJa, which amongst other things I desired to see in its own particular haunts. The route mapped out was a well known one. The drawbacks to this course are obvious, the possible finds or discoveries being neces- sarily reduced ; but one has the advantage of the experience of those who have gone before ; and I would here express my thanks to Dr. Chapman, who gave me some valuable hints, enabling me to save both time and trouble. On the journey 1 was accompanied by my wife, and her net and quick eye contributed largely to the results, especially in Lepidoptera. We reached Christiansand early in the morning of June 17th, and wc saw Norway for the first time under the most brilliant sunshine. 1901.] 25 The rocky heights behind the town form an excellent hunting ground. There are several small lakes there about 'which a species of Cordulia was sporting as early as 7 — 8 a.m. As the day wore on many butter- flies were seen, including Aporia cratcegi, Argynnis Selene, A. Eupliro- syne, Melitcea Athalia, Pararge Hiera, P. Megtsra, Lyccena ^gon, and others. We did not begin to collect in earnest until we arrived at Sae- terstoen late in the afternoon of June 18th. At this place, like Dr. Chapman and his friends, we were accommodated by Herr and Fru "Wattne at Maarud, and we were introduced to Norwegian country life under very pleasant and comfortable auspices. We had also perfect weather here, and as it had been dry during the previous two or three weeks, the traversing of the bogs was comparatively easy. We had been warned to look out for mosquitos : we experienced less trouble from these insects than we had anticipated, although towards the end of our stay at 8aetertsoen they certainly became more irrita- ting, and the big Tabanided also increased in numbers. On the Dovrefjeld mosquitos were rather troublesome, and Heematopota plu- vialis at Molde, but on the whole we did not sufter more than one usually does in the Scottish Highlands from the last named species and the hosts of Ceratopogon. As far as I am personally concerned, I still give the palm to these minute pests for their power to torment and make one thoroughly uncomfortable. To Dr. Chapman's account of the Saeterstoen district there is little to add from the Lepidopterist's point of view. Curiosity led us out on the evening of the 18th long after butterfly hours, and we succeeded in disturbing from its roosting place in a spruce our first example of lEreiia JEmhla. Subsequently we found this species and Chionohas Jutta in great force, but we were of course just rather late to get either in perfect condition. Day after day we came across fresh species, until at last we had secured all those named by Dr. Chapman, excepting P. amphidamas (which, I now fear, was overlooked) and P. comma, taking in addition, P. hrassiccB, A. Lathonia, Aglaia, and E. hyperanthus. Lycaena Amanda and P. Sippotlioe were the glory of some of Herr Wattne's uncut meadows, and it was a pretty sight to see the latter beautj' sitting towards evening with its flaming red wings outspread to the declining sun. Colzas Palceno was out earlier than Dr. Chapman's date, and we took it in splendid condition. On the borders of the " great moor " (where, by the waj% Betula nana grows, a fact not mentioned by Dr. Chapman) we found Syrich' thus centaurecd pretty frequent ; here also we took a few worn A. Freija, and, towards the end of our stay, a fresh little series of C. tiplion. 26 [January, Perhaps, on the whole, Saeterstoen is more an ideal locality for Lepidoptera than for Neuropiera and Trichoptera. By going further afield a series of lakes might have been included in our area, but it ■was inconvenient to visit them. As it was, we worked only one small lake ; for the rest we had the great river Glommen and its backwaters, one or two small brooks, and several ponds and marshes of diverse character. Considering the swampy nature of the district, there was not a superabundance of open standing water. Some of the ponds in the woods were quite charming, being filled with Calla palusfris, whose beautiful spathes were fully open. Over the water flitted hosts of two red -bodied species of Leucorrhinia and other dragon-flies. One day when working at one of these forest ponds, two eagles circling overhead helped to confirm the delightful feeling that although so near the accessories of civilization, we were where wild Nature still holds a place. The Corduline Dragon-flies were a feature in the insect life of Saeterstoen ; examples very constantly being seen flying along the railway, or high over the trees in the wood, usually difficult to secure in these circumstances. These, I take it, were either females, or males recently emerged. The males of G. cenea were abundant about the backwaters and the lake, while the males of 8. metallica were frequent at other standing waters. *S^. arctica I could not find at home, a stray female being the only one seen. Agrion was well represented in number, but chiefly A. liastulatmn. Another small species not recognised at the time proves to be an in- teresting northern species, A. concinnum. The conditions of Trichopterous life in the Glommen puzzled me a good deal. At British rivers in the month of June the burst of life is enormous ; on the Glommen for the first few days I could find absolutely no TricJioptera, nothing but a Chloroperla in numbers and a species of the Epliemeridae. Later Trichoptera did appear, but not in large numbers. I can only conclude that the Glommen is a cold, late river. On the Clyde Limnophilus fuscicornis occurs at the end of May, while the same species seemed to be just appearing on the Glommen towards the end of June. Leaving Saeterstoen on June 2Sth we proceeded to the Dovre- fjeld by way of Lake Mjosen and the Gudbraudsdal. Between Lillestrom and Eidsvold we saw from the railway plenty of Oalopteryx virgo, and between Lillehammer and Otta, the present terminus of the railway, what appeared to be Pariuissius Apollo in abundance. Neither of these insects was seen elsewhere. At Braendhaugen Lycoena 1901.1 27 Pheretes was first observed. At this place we were overtaken by a spell of cold weather, which remained with us all the time we were on the Dovrefjeld, and did much no doubt to minimize the results of our collecting. Keaching Domaas on June 30th we remained there till July 2nd. On our way from Braendhaugen we had seen little on account of the rain. At Domaas we found we had got quite into the Alpine country, Silene acaulis growing freely along the river side. Gentiana nivalis was also observed, together with many other interesting plants already seen lower down. Lyccena Pheretes was the butterfly of the waste ground near the river ; it was in the greatest abundance, and both sexes were in lovely condition. We proceeded to Fokstuen on July 2nd. As the road ascends the pines give place to birch, then the birch becomes mixed with Betula nana. When the plateau is attained a few miles from Pokstuen the eye has before it a treeless waste of tundra-like barrenness. About the pine limit Erehia Ir/ppona appeared ; this proved to be the com- monest butterfly at Fokstuen, and it ranged to a considerable height above the station. Ghionohas Noma flew on the dry stony slopes of Blaahoe just above the hotel, but it was in poor condition, the wings seldom ragged (because the weather had been fine), but often practi- cally scaleless. It also visited a swampy grassy slope, a favourite haunt of Argynnis Pales, of which half a dozen perfect examples were here taken. S. centaurece^ A. Euphrosyne, L. Pheretes, and L. optilete, were the only other butterflies taken at Fokstuen, excepting A. Freija,oi which two examples in better condition than the Saeters- toen ones were seen. On the whole I was disappointed with the numbers of butterflies here, but no doubt the cold weather was partly to blame for this. Certainly the most noteworthy insect of the Fokstuen region was jEschna ccerulea. It was everywhere amongst the openings in the birch thickets on the lower slopes of Blaahoe. The days were very cold, usually bright with sunshine in the earlier part but with a bitter wind, which seemed to increase in intensity as the day went on, the sky usually becoming more or less overcast. In the bright sunshine the Dragon-flies flew about rather freely, but later they became sluggish. They eagerly sought the places most exposed to the sun, and particu- larly loved to rest on the chalky-white bark of the birches, as many as three having been seen so resting close together on one trunk, and in one such case an example was taken with the fingers. Along with ^. ccerulea, but much rarer, was Somatochlora alpestris. 28 [Jaiuuii-y, 1901 A number of interesting boreal Trichoptera were taken on the Dovrefjeld, especially at tbe lakes, which are a feature of the Fokstuen locality. These insects will be more fully referred to in the lists which follow. The running waters produced no Caddis-flies at Foks- tuen excepting Apatania. Nymphs of Rliyacophila were found in the Fogsaa. On the whole I believe we were too early for most of the Dovrefjeld Trichoptera, certainly so as regards the species attached to streams. Principally owing to the continued cold, we returned to Domaas on July 6th. Here we found Erehin ligea out, and Argynnis Aglaia in abundance, but curiously enough A. Niohe, which Mr. Champion took here in profusion in 1889, was either remarkably scarce or I failed to find the right locality for it. An addition to my list of Odonata was made by the capture of ^schna grandis. On July 9th we started homewards by way of the Romsdal. We had little opportunity of collecting on the way. A large fritillary, likely A. Aglaia, was common, and so was P. Maera. At Fladmark one of the blues was in numbers, even eclipsing those of L. Fheretes at Domaas. We remained two days at Molde, where the weather became once more fine and warm. Butterflies and Dragon-flies were fairly abun- dant, but no additional species of either was taken. The streams were now producing their quota of insect life, and Bhyacophila nubila, the Scandinavian representative of our common dorsalis, was taken, along with several other interesting Trichopiera. From Molde we sailed direct to England. Lists of the Trichoptera, Neuroptera-Planipennia , Odonata, and Rhopalocera taken, follow. TRICHOPTERA. JS^euronm ruficrus, Scop., common at Saeterstoen. — N. lapponica, Hagen, one g at Saeterstoen, where the species was probably just coming out at the time we left. Phryganea striata, Linn., taken in great abundance at the lake near Saeterstoen, also frequent at Fokstuen and observed at Christiansand.- — P. obsoleta, McL., taken at Domaas, and common at the lakes near Fokstuen. Agrypnia picta, KoL, came out slowly at Saeterstoen, where two $ and one ? were taken ; a long series could have been secured at Molde, but they were past their best as regards condition. — A. Pagetana, Curt., a curious form, no doubt Mr. McLachlan's var. hyperborea, was found at the Fokstuen lakes ; it has both pairs of wings somewhat lanceolate, quite different from the type ; the only J taken mea- sures in expanse 20 mm., while the females range from 18 to 24 mm. Grammotaulius signatipennis, McL., one newly emerged example of this inter- esting species at Fokstuen. February, 1901.] 29 Limnophilus subcentralis, Brauer, one ? at Saeterstocn. — L. marmoratus, Curt., one (J at Saeterstoen. — L. stigma, Curt., one at Saeterstoen and a few at Uoinaaa. — L. pantodapus (Wlgr.), McL., five examples, all from the same pond, at Fokstuen ; one or two approaching the typical form, the others pertaining to hyalinatus. — L. picturatns, McL., half a dozen ? at Saeterstoen, varying much in the deptli of markings. — L. centralis, Curt., a few examples from Christiaiisand, Saeterstoen and 'MolAc. — L. griseus, Linn., a few at Saeterstoen. — L. scalenus, Wlgr., two newly developed males at Domaas, taken along with Fhacopteryx brevipennis. — L. de- spectus. Walker, a short series from Saeterstoen.— iy. extricatus, McL., one fall of the year, 9 s commonly in March, April, and May, Levenside Moor. Schallcriana, L., not uncommon, Crofthugen, Quarry Wood, &c. coniparafia, Hh., common, Crofthugen, Noble- ston, Quarry Woods, &c. perplexana. Bar., occurs frequently at Crofthugen, Bonhill. comariana, Zell., Levenside Moor. variegana, Sch., very common throughout the district, dark leaden variety not uncommon. ferruffana, Tr., not uncommon, Crofthugen, in the autumn and also in the spring (hibernated). caledoniana, St., very abundant on Lcvenside Moor. Logiana, Sch., scarce, Crofthugen. aspersana, Hb., common, Quarry Wood and Levenside Moor. Rhacodia caudana, Hb., common among sallows, dark variety scarce ; var. ochracea, St., not uncommon, Crofthugen, Nobleston, &c. Teras contaminana, Hb., common and very variable, generally distributed. Dictyopteryx L(rJiin(;iana,L.,sca,vce, Quarry Woods and Levenside. Hnlmi- ana, L., scarce, Levenside. Bergmanniana, L., not uncommon, Nobleston, Napierston, &c. Argyrotoza Conwayana, Fb., common, Dumbarton Road, Levenside, and Croft- hugen. Ptycholoma Lecheana, Li., common on oak, seldom met with in the perfi'ct state, but the larvae are easily found. Penthina corticana, Hb., scarce, Levenside and Crofthugen. betuletana, Haw., common on birch, Tullichewan, Levenside, &c. xororcniana, Zett., scarce, Levenside. pruniana, Hb., not uncommon, generally distributed. variegana, Hb., very common, met with everywhere in hawtliorn hedges. lledya dealbana, Frol., scarce, Grallangad. Spilonota trimacu/ana, Haw., Crofthugen and Dumbarton Road. Pardia tripunctana, Fb., abundant among roses, generally distributed. Sericoris cespitana, Hb., Levenside, scarce. urticana, Hb., not uncommon, generally distributed. laeunana, Dup., Nobleston, Anchencarrocli, Crofthu- gen, &c., not uncommon. Mixodia Schulziana, Fb., very common on Levenside IVfoor. palustrana, Zell., scarce, Levenside Woods. Orthotania antiquana, Hb., scarce, Dillichip. Cnephasia politana, Haw., common on Levenside Moor, bright varieties. musculana, Hb., common, vei'y variable. Sciaphila suhjectana, Gn., not uncommon, Levenside, Crofthugen, Tulliche- wan, &c. virgaureana, Fr., met with almost everywhere, very dark. patcu- 1001.] 35 ana, lib., scarco, LeviMisido Woods. octomacidana, Haw., common along the Forth and Clydo Railway, may be found coninioiily resting on paUngs. Capua faciUaceana, Hb., scarce, Loch Loniondside. Clepsis ruxticnua, Leveiisidc Moor and Noblcston, not uncommon on marshy parts. Bactra lanceolana, Hb., abundant in inarsby parts, varies from unicolorous dark brown to white. Phoxopteri/x unguicella, L., Carman Hill, and Levenside Moor. myrtiUana, Fr., Levenside Moor, not uncommon.- Luiidann, Fb., connnon on Forth and Clyde Railway, near Jamestown, and on Levenside. Mitterhaeheriana, Sch., scarce, Q.uarry Woods. Qrapholitha ramella, L., very common on birch ; var. Pa i/kul liana, common and generally distributed. nisella, Clcrck, not uncommon in Crofthugcn Wood. cineraria, Haw., scarce, Levenside. nigromaculana, Haw., not uncommon and generally distributed, on ragwort. suhocelluna, Don., very common every- where on sallows. trimaculana, Don., abundant on elm, Dumbarton Road and Crofthugen.^ Penkleriana, Fisch., everywhere common on hazel. ncBvana, Hb., not uncommon on holly, Crofthugen, Levenside, &c. geminnna, St., common among " blaeberry," Levenside Moor and Croftliugen. Phlceodes tetraquetrana, Haw., not uncommon, Levenside, Gallangad, and Crofthugen. immundana, Fisch., Gallangad and Crofthugen. Hypermecia augustana, Hb., common and generally distributed, on sallow. In 1898 I bred a specimen of this species, vvhicli when it emerged possessed but three wings, showing no signs of the left hind-wing. Batodes anyustiorana, Haw., scarce, usually taken at rest on walls, Dillichip. Pcedisca bilunana, Haw., not common, Crofthugen. rubiginosana, H.-S., scarce, Quarry Wood and Levenside Moor. corticana, Hb., abundant everywhere. ophthalmicana, Hb., common on poplars, Crofthugen. occultana, Dough, very common among pine woods, Levenside Moor. Solandriana, L., not common, Crofthugen. sordidana, Hb., very common, Crofthugen, Levenside, &c. Ephippiphora similana, Hb., not uncommon, Crofthugen, Quarry Woods, &c. c«V*/ana, ZcU., Forth and Clydo Railway, near Jamestown. PJlugiana,JIaw., very common on Levenside Moor, &c., larva common in stems of thistles. Brun- nichiana, Frol., very common near Jamestown, Levenside, &c. inopiana, Haw. scarce, Jamestown. trigeminana, St., scarce, Quarry Wood. Coccyx spJendidulana, Gn., scarce, Crofthugen. argyranu, common, Croft- hugen. tcEdella, Clerck, common among firs, Levenside Moor, &c. nanana, Tr., not uncommon, Levenside Moor, along with teedella. vacciniana, Fisch., Levenside Moor. Pamplusia mercuriana, Hb., very common on moorlands. Retinia pinioorana, Zell., common in j)ine woods. resinella, L., scarco, Levenside. Carpocapsa siplendana, Hb., one specimen, Alexandria. pnmonella, L., not uncommon, about gardens. 30 [February, Stigmotiota coniferana, Ratzb., not iineommon in pine woods, Cvoftlutgen and Levcnsido Moor. perlepidana. Haw., abundant along the embankments of the Forth and Clyde Railway near Jamestown. roseticolana, Zell., scarce, Quarry Wood. Dicrorampha Petiverella, L., very comniou on the F. and C. Railway near Jamestown, flies readily in the afternoon. plumhana, Scop., Levenside Moor, flies in the sunshine. herbosann, Bar., very common, Crofthugen, Levenside, &c., flies principally in the evening, may be seen swarming along the hedgerows. Pyrodes Rhediella, Clerck, scarce. Hue G-len. Catoptria ulicetana, Haw., very abundant on furze. cana, Haw., common, Levenside, Woodside, &c. Trycheris nurana, Fb., common on Heracleum flowers, flies in the sunshine, but may be taken at rest on dull days, or in the evening on the flower heads. Simaethis oxyacanthella, L., very abundant everywhere. Eupoecilia nana, Haw., common, Quarry Wood. atricapitana, St., scarce, Q.uarry Wood. maculosana, Haw., scarce, Crofthugen and Quarry Wood. angustana, Hb., abundant on moorlands. cilieJla, Hb., not uncommon on the railway banks near Jamestown. Xanthosetia hamana, L., scarce, Quarry Wood. Argyrolepia Hartmanniana, Clerck, scarce, Levenside Moor. badiana, Hb., scarce, Levenside. cnicana, Dbl., not uncommon, Crofthugen, Levenside, &c. Conchylis Smeathmanniana, Fb., scarce, Q.uarry Wood. straminea, Haw., very common and generally distributed. Aphelia osseana. Scop., not uncommon in marshy parts, Levenside, &c. Tortricodes hyemana, Hb., common, Cameron and Tullichewan. {To he continued). THE GENERIC NOMENCLATURE OF THE NOCTUA POPULARIS OF FABRICIUS. BY LOUIS B. PROUT, F.E.S. Mr. McLachlan pointed out a few years ago (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxii, p. 175) that the name Neuronia, Hb., wliich is applied to the above species in many of our lists, was pre-occupied, and therefore untenable, and that another generic name would be required. Mr. Barrett, however (Brit. Lep., iv, pp. 133, 266), while avoiding the use of the pre-occupied name, has also succeeded in avoiding the necessity of a new one, having applied Heliophohus, Boisd., to popnlaris and cespitis, and UlocJilcena, Led., of which the type is hirta, to hispidus. This is satisfactory in so far that it corrects Lederer's erroneous re- striction of Heliophohus to hispidus, and for some time I hoped it might prove to be perfectly sound on the historical method of type- 1901.] 37 fixation; for Stephens (Syst. Cat., ii, p. H2 : III. Haust., ii, p. 189) restricts the TIcliophuhus of Boisduval to popularis and leucopluea, removing snponaricd to Hndena, and Westwood, in 1840, specifies 2)opularis as the type. But some valuable notes on the exact dates of publication of Du))onchers Hist. Nat. Lep., have been kindly placed at my service by Mr. C. Davies Sherborn, F.Z.S.,and these show posi- tively that Duponchel's List of Noctuid types (Tom. vii, Pt. 2, pp. 71, 72, March 21st, 1829) appeared prior to Stephens' work (June 1st, 1829), and that therefore we must look to him and not to Stephens for the first restriction of the genus ; and inasmuch as he selects saponaricB for the type, Stephens and Westwood must be ruled " out of order," and Neuria, Gn. (with type saponariw), must sink as a synonym before Heliophobus. The question which remains is whether popularis be really con- generic with cespitis, Fab., with which Mr. Barrett unites it; if so, the correct generic name is either Tholera, Hb. (Verz., p. 214), a mixed genus, which by Stephens' first use (List Brit. Anim., p. 68, 1850) would become restricted to the type cespitis, or, rather, Charceas, Steph. [111. Haust., ii, p. 108 (1829)], to which Westwood in 1840 assigns the same type, cespitis. But if, as I half fear, the two species in question should prove to be not congeneric, I believe the introduction of a new generic name for popularis will be unavoidable ; at any rate, a very thorough investigation of the literature has failed to reveal any existing one which could possibly be applied to it. Note. —Perhaps as I have mentioned Charaas, Steph., I ought to add that its application to graminis, L., is utterly erroneous ; only four years after the foundation of the genus Curtis erected the monotypical Cerapteryx ioY graminis, ViwA in 1850 Stephens himself accepted this as a restriction of his Charcsas. 246, Richmond Road, N.E. : November Hth, 1900. ON A SPANISH BEMBIDIUM (Suhgen. TESTEDIOLUM). BY D. SUARP, M.A., M.D., F.B.S. The species of Bemhidium allied to B. glaciate are of considerable interest, ovAing to the fact that, in consequence of their peculiar habitat, they are in certain districts completely segregated ; so that the individuals of one such segregated area never mix with those from another. These insects dwell about the edges of melting snow-fields, and are only to be found where such snow-fields occur every year, and 38 [Pebru:iry, are of (ixtciit sufricicnt to ensure that the\' do not disappear until the warm season is well advanced, hi such places these Bemhidiiom may be found in great profusion ; but I have never heard of a single ex- ample being found away from the natural habitat, or at an elevation of less than GOOO feet. Although these insects are abundant in their native haunts they are not very well represented in collections, and considerable difference of opinion has been expressed as to the number of species, their characters and synonymy. The last edition of Reitter's Catalogue admits five species, two only of which are supposed to occur in Western Continental Europe ; the others are from the Caucasus, Turkey and Corsica. The species from the last locality is known I believe only by a single example in the late M. Reiche's collection. As regards the two species of Central Europe, B. glaciale and B. pyrenceum, much difference of opinion has prevailed. Ganglbauer admits them as valid. I have never found B. (jJnciale, but B. pyrenceum I have come across in several localities, viz., 8avoy (Albertville), East Pyrenees (Canigou), the Cantabrian Mountains (Reynosa and Picos d'Europa). Notwithstanding this rather wide distribution, T think all the individuals from the localities mentioned are one species ; tliough as T have preserved but a small number of specimens my opinion is not a very strong one. B. pyrenceum is recorded by Grraells (Mem. Com. mapa geol. Espaila, 1855, Zool., p. 32) as occurring in Central and Southern Spain, " Pirineos orientales, Cataluiia alta y Andalucia, Granada." I found specimens on the edges of the large snow-field on the Pico de Peiialara in the Sierra Guadarrama ; and also on an alpine meadow in the Sierra Nevada at an elevation of about 10,000 feet. These specimens show well marked differences from the more northern insects, and I think should be separated. The Andalusian examples are the most distinct ; the specimens from the Guadarrama apj)roach- ing distinctly to those from the Cantabrian mountains. AVe may assume the Sierra Nevada form to be B. monfanum, Rambur. It is 4 — 4| mm. long, of depressed form, with the thorax very much narrowed behind, and the basal constricted portion longer than in any of the other forms ; the elytral punctuation is finer, and almost entirely obliterated at the sides and apex ; the antenna? are more slender than they are in the allied forms. Rambur described B. mofitanum from a single individual found, " dans les montagnes de la Sierra Nevada." His description is very poor, and would not lead one to refer it to an ally of B. ylncinlc, though it contains nothing incompatible with the insect I am discussing. It is placed in the 1001.] 39 recent catalogues as a syiiouyui of B. pyrenodum, so that the name may l)e applied to the Sierra Nevada species without giving rise to any con- fusion. Kambur collected I believe in the same spot as that in which the specimens before me were found, viz., near the top of the great valley in the Alpujarras, leading up from Lanjaron to the high ridge in propinquity to the summit of Mu]ha9en. The individuals from the snow-fields of the Sierra Guadarrama certainly approach considerably to the Cantabrian form. In size and general appearance they resemble B. viontanum, but the thorax has the basal constricted portion less elongate. This form may bear the name of B. carpetnnum. Although I think it probable that if speci- mens were captured in large numbers all the forms, including B. glnciale, would be found to be connected ; yet, as the great majority of specimens can apparently be separated, it is well to have distinct names for the forms. Cambridge : October 16th, 1900. CHRYSOPA DORS ALTS, Bttem., A SPECIES NEW TO BRITAIN. BY ROBERT McLACHLAN, F.R.S., &c. Amongst some Neuroptera collected by Mr. Beaumont in 1900 I find a very good example of this rather striking species, taken at Oxshott, Surrey, on July 7th. It is a fir-frequenting insect, widely spread over Europe, extending to Scandinavia, but possibly nowhere very common. Personally I have met with it only in Belgium and Switzerland, in single examples. Ch. dorsaJis is much like Ch. peria, L., and is liable to be confounded there- with. It is of the same form, with much black on the body, and the neuration very nuich mixed with black. Ch. perla can always be distinguished by the distinct blue-gveon colour of the pale parts, very conspicuous on the wing. In Ch. dorsalis the body colour is yellowish-green rather than blue-green, and there is a very broad unbroken black margin on either side of the pronotum ; in perla this margin is more or less broken up by the pale ground : the sub-costa in the anterioa-wings is black in dorsalis, at any rate in its basal half; it is green in perla : the costal area in the anterior wings is much narrower in dorsalis : and as a structural character of great importance the tarsal claws are simple in dorsalis (as in phyllochroma, Wesm., &c.), and much dilated at the base in perla : there are also differences in the markings of the head, &c., but the characters above-noticed will suffice to se- parate the two. A variety in which the femora are more or less piceous has received the name of pini (Brauer). Mr. Beaumont has generously allowed me to retain the specimen_ Although many insects of comparatively feeble flight are liable to appear " sporadically " in an unaccountable manner, I think it more likely that Gh. dorsalis has been overlooked, on account of its re- semblance to perla, by the few^ entomologists who attend to these insects. Lewisham, London : Dec. 2^rd, 1900. 40 [Februaiy, ON THE NEW NOMENCLATURE OF HIE FAMILY CECIDOMYIM, ADOPTED BY MR. RUIJSAAMEN AND OTHERS. BY BARON C. K. v. d. OSTEN SACKEN, Hon. F.E.S. During my studies on Cecidomyidce in the United States, I have had occasion to become acquainted with the history of their classifica- tion, and when Dr. Karsch, in his Inaugural Dissertation (Revision der Gallmilcken, Miinster, 1S77), made an attempt to change the at that time existing nomenclature, in virtue (as he thought) of the p7'inciple of priority, I was fully prepared to interpose my objection in my Cat. N. A. Dipt., 2d ed., 1878, p. 215, where I said, " that the general adoption of these changes does not seem at all desirable." Dr. Karsch's principal innovation consisted in assuming that Meigen's original Cecidomyia (IHig. Mag., 1803) should be considered as a sy- nonym of Diplosis, Loew (1850), because the species adopted by Meigen as type in 1808 (Tipula pini, Deg.) was a Diplosis (Karsch, /. c, p. 11). Mr. E. H. Eiibsaamen, a colleague of Dr. Karsch in the Berlin Museum, adopted this view in his paper. Die Gallmiicken des Konigl. Mus., &c., in Berlin (Berl. Ent. Z., 1892), and introduced other inno- vations, the ultimate result of which was that, contrai'y to the general rule of nomenclature, the generic name of Cecidomyia. was dropped, and other genera substituted for it : Oliyofrophus, Latr., Itho2)nlocera, n. g., Dichelomyia, n. g., &c. (/. c., p. 320). To Mr. Eiibsaamen belongs the undoubted merit of having in- troduced an improved method of the scientific study of the Cecidomyidce^ and of developing it since with remarkable diligence. It would have appeared invidious on my part to interfere with his success by pub- lishing at that time a criticism of his nomenclature, and I have preferred therefore to inform him privately of my disagreement with him. As he did not accept my opinion, I see no reason why I should (after an interval of eight years) withhold it any longer from the public. The first steps, both of Meigen and Latreille, in defining the concept of Cecidomyia, were merely tentative. In " Tlliger's Magazin" (1803) Meigen founded this genus upon De Geer's figure of his Tipula pini. The short definition is taken from this figure : " Antenna? por- rect, bent upwards, knotty, bristly (knotig, borstig) ; 24-jointed in the male, 12-jointcd in the female." The same definition is found in Meigen's " Klassification," &c. (ISOi). Meigen had never seen the insect, and, as late as lsl8, in his System. Beschr., i, p. 99, he mentions 1901.] 41 it among the species unknown to him. In the KLissification (iSO-t), pp. 38 — 39, Meigen explicitly avows his limited knowledge of the genus, and says about the diagnosis : " Whether all the species partake of these characters 1 cannot tell ; the number of the antennal joints seems to be variable. In general this genus requires more study yet." Under such circumstances MM. Karsch and Riibsaamen had no reason to assume, as they did, that Meigen, in adopting his original definition of Gecidomyia, intended to make it permanent, and thus unwittingly forestalled the concept of Diplosits, Loew ! Meigen would certainly have protested against such an assumption, and would have referred to his principal work, in which he again acknowledges his uncertainty about the number of the joints of the antennae. In his Syst. Beschr., i, p. 93, the diagnosis says : " Antenna) porrect, mam/ -jointed, joints separated ;" the detailed characterization which follows adds : " The number of joints is difficult to determine, because they are very easily damaged in captivity. I have generally found 24 in the male and only 12 in the female ; Cec. ribesii (^ has 12-joiuted antenna)." In presence of such positive statements about the uncertainty of Meigen in the matter of the number of the joints of the antennae, the expression of Mr. Kiibsaamen, that Meigen had become unfaithful to himself {''' wei\ Meigen sich selbst spater untreu wurde ") is not well chosen ! (Comp. Berl. E. Z., 1892, p. 325, line 14 from top). The first mention of Gecidomyia in Latreille's publications occurs in the Dictioun., &c., of Deterville, 1st ed., vol. xxiv, 1804, p. 107, and in the Hist. Nat. des Crust, et des Ins., vol. xiv, 1805, p. 292. The defini- tion is the same in both publications : " Anteunes filiformes a articles presque egaux, globuleux, velus ; trompe saillante ; ailes couchees horizoutalement sur le corps. Tijo. pini, Deg." The new genus Oli- gotrophus is introduced at the same time ; its definition is as follows : " Trompe point saillante, antennes moniliformes, tete transversale ; je rapporte a ce genre la Tipule des galles du Genevrier de De Geer, vi, tab. 25, f. 7, 8." That the definitions of both genera were based merely upon De Geer's figures is evident. Winnertz's (Stett. Ent. Z., 1854, p. 324) supposition, that Latreille knew De Geer's jiiniperina in nature seems to me very improbable. In Latreille's first matured work on Diptera, the Genera, &c., vol. iv, p. 252 (1809), he gave up his Oligotrophns and introduced the genus Gecidomyia, as follows : — Gen. (533. — Gecidomyia, Latr., lllig. — Tipula, De Geer. — Oligo- trophus, Latr. — Ghirononius, Fabricii. The Cec/(/o«2yiV?, Latr., lllig., means here of course, Latreille, Meigen 42 [Febmaiy, in Illigcr'H l\[;iga.zin (1808). Upon this follows a descriptive notice of the characters of tlie imago, a few words about the larvjc, pupa? and galls, aud a list of the species previously described. The number of joints of the antennse is stated thus: — " illorum rumiero pro sexu vario " (12 in feminis, 24 in masculis, Meigeu), which proves that Latreille, in this case, relied on Meigen's " Klassification " (1804). This passage of Latreille (1809) became the starting ]joint of the generic concept, Cecidomi/ia, Meigen-Latueille, which, with the im- provement in its definition introduced by Meigen in his principal work of 1818, has prevailed in Dipterology up to the time when Rondani and Loew began to subdivide the genus. This essential fact has been entirely overlooked by MM. Karsch and Riibsaaraen, or, at least, their nomenclature is in entire disagreement with it. (Meigen, in his work of 1818, had introduced in the definition the very useful character, " first joint of the tarsi very short "). Rondani has maintained this concept, and, in his very first work on Cecidomyia (Memoria Seconda, &c., 1840, p. 12), in the enumera- tion of the genera, we find : Grenus V, Cecidomyia, Meigen-Latkeille, after which Rondani goes on with his own subdivisions. Mr. Rlib- saamen has not noticed this passage, and has misinterpreted Rondani (in his paper of 1892, p. 324, at bottom), when he praises him for having acted with perfect correctness, and for having shown respect to Meigen's memory (" pietatvoll gehandelt") in restoring the genus Cecidomyia in the original oneaning of Meigen, that is, as having 24 anteunal joints in the male and 12 in the female, and being therefore a Diplosis in the sense of Loew. (The quotation from Loew's Progr., 1850, p. 20, adduced by Riibsaamen in the same place, p. 325, at top, is correct as far only as it refers to Cecidomyia, Kond., sensu stricto, in his Mem., 2^'^, pp. 13 — 15 [1840], and not to Genus V, Cccydomyia, Meig., Latr., on p. 12 of the same paper). Thus far I have shown that Mr. Riibsaamen's new nomenclature has been based upon an entire misunderstanding of Meigen's, La- treille's and Rondani's publications on the subject. In regard to Rondani especially, it is difiicult to understand how Mr. Rubsaamen has not perceived in that author's papers on Cecidomyia there is not a single allusion to the concept of the principal genus which he attributes to him. On the contrary, in the Stirpis Cecido- myidarum r/enera revisa (Atti, &c., di Milano, vol. ii, 1861), published eleven years after Loew's Monograph of 1850, the genera Cecidomyia and Diplosis are characterized as usual (on p. 12) : Cecidomyia, under F is mentioned as having the same number of antenual joints in both 1901.] 43 sexes ; and Diplosis, iiiuler FF, as having half the luunber of joints in the female : " feuiinfi nuinero circiter duplo miuori articulis inascu- lorum." I have searched in vain for auy reference to Meigeu's KlassificatioD (1804) iii Eondaui'a works, and I am inclined to believe that he never possessed, nor consulted, that now rather rare volume.* It is so many years since I have given up the study of Cecidomi/lcE, that it would be impossible for me to propose now any improvement in the present nomenclature of the Family. I would only venture to suggest that the concept Cecydomyia, Meigen-Latreille, in its main features, was a very natural and useful generic concept, and should have been preserved, es{)ecially in view of the mnemonic requirements of classification. On this subject, and on the mischief of unneces- sarily multiplying genera, I have expressed my opinion in the Berl. Eut. Z., 1895, p. 160, at bottom, where I have said, "The true end of classification is an easier survey of affinities, a temporary aid to memory. In space and time all divisions become convergent and finally coufiuent." What I would propose now would be to restore, as far as possible, the original concept of Cecidomyiu of Meigen and Latrcille, and to consider tlie very numerous new genera, since formed at its expense, as subgenera. MM. Karsch and Eiibsaamen have done so much useful work since their beginnings, that 1 hope they will not take in bad part the publication of a criticism which I have kept in petto for thirty years. Heidolbcrg : January, 1901. ABEEDEENSHIRE DIPTERA. BY TUE REV. E. N. BLOOMPIELD, M.A., F.E.S. Mr. J. Mearns, of Aberdeen, has kindly sent me for confirmation or determination the greater part of his collection of Dq)tera ; among them are some very interesting species, I therefore now give a selection from them. In the "Scottish Naturalist " for July, 1883, there is a good list by Mr. W. Armston Vice, M.B., of JDiptera taken by himself in the north of Scotland, principally near Aberdeen, and also a few taken by Mr. Vcrrall in 1870 near Aberdeen, and at Braemar. Most of Mr. Mearns' species are the same as are contained in this list, but there are a good number of additions, some very common * The bookseller Hoepli, in Milan, pnvohasod Rondani'.s library after his death, and I then acquired .several works which belonged to it, among others the complete collection of Rondani's liand-copieK of his own publications. Of this collection I liave made a present to the Italian Entomological Society in Florence. I do not reniember noticing Meigon's Klassification (1S04) in Hoepli's Catalogue at that time. 44 [February, .specicH, and otliors of considerable! interest. The very connnon species, such as Ilomalomi/ia cauicular/s, &c., are not now included, and those species which are already recorded near Aberdeen in Mr. Vice's list I have marked *. All the following species were met with at no great distance from Aberdeen, the neighbourhood of Banchory, which is about 25 miles to the west, being the most distant. LiMNOBiD^. — Symplecta punctipennis, Mg., Banchory ; Phalacrocera repli- cata, Jj , White Stripes, near Aberdeen. TiPULiDJS. — *Dolichopeza sylvlcola, Curt., Banchory : Tipiila Dianw, Mg., White Stripes; this species and P. replicata were several times bred. TABANIDJ2. — Chrysops relictus, Mg., Locli Skene ; Then'oplectes ? sohtitialis, Mg., Banchory ; a very variable series, perhaps not all the same species. Taba- iius cordiger, W., and Atylotus ftilvns, Mg., Banchory. LEPTID.3E. — * Sympheromyia crassicornis, Pz. SYKPHlD.ffi. — Paragus tibialis, Fin., and Chilosia sparscf, Lw., Banchory; PyrophcBna ocymi, F., Muchals, Kincardine, Stain ; Didea intermedia, Lw., *Syr- phus punctulatus, Ver., iS. compositarum, Ver., and S. grossularia, Mg., all near Banchory, Anterior legs = Pedes anteriores (excluding '''postici'''). 2. "I ., > Posterior legs = Pedes posferiores (excluding " antici "). Let it be clearly understood that there is only ONE pair of front, middle or hind lecjs. but that there are TWO pairs of anterior or posterior lerjs. The above definition of course applies to parts, such as femora, tibiae, tarsi, &c. Anterior does NOT mean front only. Posterior does NOT mean hind only. N.B. — American Journals please copy. Sussex Lodge, N'ewmarket : Fehruari/, 1901. THE COMPLETED HISTORY OF HARPALUS FROLICHII, Stuhm, AS A BRITISH INSECT. BV CLAUDE MORLEY, F. E. S., &c. It is with much regret that I now state my conviction that this line species must be looked upon as a thing of the past in Britain. I will not attempt to explain the inexplicable, for its disappearance is nothing less. First found in May, 1897, it was not positively deter- mined to be the above species by Mr. E. A. Newbery till February 24th, LS9S, nor jjublished as new to Britain till the following April.* " Cj'., Eut. JIo. Mag., xxxiv, pp S4, S-i ; Coleopt. of Suffolk, pp. xi et 0. 1001.] 65 Fruui the middle of the next April it gradually increased in nuuibers, still within its extremely limited range, till the middle of June, and had practically disappeared by the end of the mouth. During July I took one or two Geodcphagous larva3 beneath stoues, thinking they possibly might appertain to this species, but I failed to rear them, and no better success attended two or three pairs of imagines previously brought home and surrounded with a natural pabulum with a view to obtaining ova. Towards the end of the mouth the beetle begau to emerge on the Plateau, one or two being still immature when found. 1 was away throughout August, and repeated diligent searchings in JSeptember were abortive. The only subsequent capture was that of a solitary specimen, a little removed from the headquarters, early in xlugust, 1899.* It has not occurred at all during the past season. Mr. P. B. Mason and Mr. E. C. Bedwell have searched the spot for the species too late. Mr. E. A. Elliott is the only collector besides myself who has taken H. Frdlichii.f The habits appear to vary in no way from those of other Harpali^ notably H. discoideus, with which the species was almost constantly found, though much less commonly. It is not gregarious, and the only occasion upon which 1 took more than two beneath a single shelter was under a large felled fir log, where were ten specimens. Subsequently it was found only beneath stones, usually small, more or less embedded in the sandy soil, into which these insects are wont to burrow beneath the stone and so further escape the sun's rays. The last specimen was the only one found exposed to the light of day. The majority were taken in dull, warm weather, with, perhaps, a tine rain falling, snugly ensconced just beneath the sides of the stone. Though the surrounding country was searched in apparently exactly- similar environments no trace of the insect was discernible, and no reason obtained for the total disappearance of what a couple of years ago seemed a fairly strong colony. A mention of some of its associates may yet further illustrate the natural circumstances under which the species is found, and, first, I may say the Plateau is covered, where no bracken grows and * On Juiic 0th, 1899, I visited the Plateati with Mr. Morley, and failed to discover a single specimen of this species, or of any other, in its old haunts. I noticed that the ground was thickly covered with sheep tracks, and that even the smallest stone had heen moved out of its bed. May not this have something to do with tlie disaxopearance of the insects? On no previous occasion had tliere been any trace of sheep on that part of the Plateau. — E. A Elliott. + Entire dduils or capiare : — 189V : May 4th, 0 examples, 4 by E. A E. ; 29th, 10 examples. 1898 : Aijril Ibth, 4 examples ; 28th, 15 examples, and several passed by ; May 6tli, 8 examples, and a dozen passed by ; 13th, 4 exaoiples ; June 4th, 9 examisles, 8 by E. A. E. ; atb, 9 examples by E. A. E. ; 18th, 8 examples, and several passed by ; 21st, only 4 examples seen ; 28th, 1 male onlj' ; July 29th, 2 examples, and .several immature passed ^^y . 1899 : Aug\ist 7th, 1 example walking in a ploughed field about luu yanls fmm I'latnau. Total, 8il spceiiiieiis taken, of which the sexes were very nearly ei^ually distrib\ited. 66 [March, the sandy soil is not entirely bare, by a short growth consisting chiefly of Oniifhojms jyerpiisillns, Aira prcccox, with a few plants of Erodium cicutnrium and Erica ; later in the summer Bumex acctoselln, Filofjo minima, and TvifoUum arvense become evident, with Reseda Jiitea, sparingly, though there is no chalk stratum. The most abundant insects, though many are common, were Metahletus fuveola, Conostethus roseus, and Flar/iognathus saltitans. In all ninety-two species of Coleoptera have been found within this circumscribed space, of which a few are common coast species, c.r/., Broscus cepliaJotes, CuJalhus fnscns and C. flavipes, Amura J'uha, rarely, and A. considaris, Cocciiiella W-punclata, Notoxus monoceros, RhiJoprdon r/eminrttiis, Sifonrs f/riseus, and others that are seen in all sand districts.* Among the rarer kinds that have occurred to me beneath these stones arc Harpalus discoideus, H. consentanciis, Amnra continua, A. lunicollis and A. hifrons^ Platyderus rvJicoUis, Philonthus succicola, in carrion, Medon casfaneits (about the fourth British example), Hister 12-strintus, Olihrus pyguKBus, Pityophagusferrurjineus, in logs, Byrrhus dorsalis, Limonius cyJiudricus, Apioii loti, Gronops lunatus, and Mecinus circulatus. The pupae of Goccinella 1-punclata, W-punctata and 22- p>unctata are often abundant, conspicuously attached to the upper sui-face of the hot stones in the full glare of the sunshine towards the end of June. Comparatively few Hemiptera have a])peared, e.g., JVysius thymi, Pci'ifrechus qeniculatus, Triphhps nigra, Bhyparochromiis cltiragra, and R. dilatatus, PJni/iorjnathus pnlicarius, Acocephalus liistrionicus, and, of course, Sfiroma jjteri'/is. Of Dipfera, Thereva nobiUtata, Conops Jlavipes have been noted, and Pulex leporis was one day common at the mouth of a rabbits' hole. Apterous Hymenoptera: Agrothereutes ahhreviator and Pezomachus pumilus, Mutilla rnfipes, Myrmica scabri- nodis, and Myrmosa melanocephala occur sparingly, with Saliiis parvultts and Anthophora pilipes, but I do uot think these Fossors and parasites would attack so well mailed and concealed a Coleopteron, and it is not until we more fully comprehend the effects of geologic and atmospheric influences upon the propagation of species and their strange migra- tions that we shall explain the rise and fall of Harpalus Frdlichii in Britain. Ipswich : January, 1901. * I may perhaps be allowed to here mention that the stridulating files of Gcotrupes ii/pltwus, which occurs sparingly on the Plateau, are situated on the elytra, and that the sound i.s pro- duced by friction of the abdomen upon these organs, as is the case in Cojiria and Ligyrus {c/., Gahan, Trans. Ent. Unc, 'lOOU, p. 448). The .striated cosie riiay, however, also resonate (/. c. 446), since 1 did not test this. 1901.] 67 ACULEATE I{Y31EN0PTEEA IN PERTHSHIRE. BY A. K. J. OAETKK. In connection with the notes on Scottish Acidcatcs in Ent. Mo. Mag. for November, 1900, and January, 1901, perhaps the following note on species taken by me at Comrie, Perthshire, may be of interest. I collected there in 1898 during the first two weeks of July, and in 1900 from June 23rd to July 7th. In 1900 on most days the weather was unfavourable for collecting, being dull and wet, yet I found insects of all Orders much more abundant than in 1898, when I had not a single wet day. In the Aculeates, to which group I more especially confined my attention, I noticed only one exception to this, viz., Crahro cribrarius, Linn., which I took in numbers all over the district in 1898, while last year I only came across a single specimen. During the two visits I took altogether nearly sixty species, the more noteworthy of which only are noticed here. Mr. Saunders has very kindly made or confirmed the determinations : — Formica ru/a, Linn., ? , 1900 ; Leptothorax acervoriim, Fab., (? ? ^ , from a nest in the ground ; Tiphia minuta, v. de Lind., one $ , 1900 ; Agenia variegata, Linn., very abundant on walls, explorinji; crevices for spiders ; Ceropales maculafa, Fab., several in 1898 ; Halius parvulus, Dlilb., cJ ^ , 1898 and 1900 ; pusillus, Scliiodle, $ , 1900; Fompilus niger, Fab., common ; approximatus, Sm., $ , 1900 ; ^i6i«s, Fab., several $^s; spissus, Schiodtc, common; unguictilaris, Thorns., two ?, 1900; pectinipes, v. de Lind., ?, 1898. The species of Salius and Pompilus occurred freely along a road running by a wood. They were nesting in a sandy bank, and in the earth of a stone dyke. P. niger and s-pissus were especially common. A large brown spider abundant on the ground an)ong short vegetation seemed to be their prey. I found it in the nest of spissus with an egg attached to the left side of the abdomen. Passalcecus moni/icoriiis, Dbm., one ^ , July 4th, 1900 ; Pemphredon, Shuckardi, Moraw., common in garden ; lethifer, Shuck., one ? in same place ; Crabro palmipes, Linn., very comnvon all over the district on both visits ; dimidiatus. Fab., also common ; leucostomus, Linn., several, 1900, nesting in a gate post ; varius, Lep., June 28th, 1900. The Aniliopltila were not so well represented as the " wasps." I took, aaiongst others : — Halictus suhfasciatiis, Nyl., common ; villosulus, Kirb. ; also Smeathmanellus , Kirb., abundant at their burrows and at yellow composites ; Andrena anal is, Panz., common; coitana, Kirb., also connnon ; /wca^a, Sm., 1900, (J , very abundant at flowers of llnlius ; nana, Kirb., 1900, common ; Nomada ohttisifrons, Nyl., 1898, at a bank with Andrena analis and coilaiia, but I did not see it enter the burrows of 68 [Marcli, eitlier ; ntjicornis, Linn., several atRiibus; Jiacuijuttafa, Kirb., 1898 and 1900, both sexes ill coinpaiij with Aiulreua ininnf u/n, K^irb.; Boinbus lapponicus, Fab., 1898 aiul 1900. I do not tliiuk that tliis ]i«t by any means exhausts the district, as all my time was not given to collecting, and several promising locali- ties I did not tr}'^ at all. Sclville Cottage, Portobullo, Edinburgli : January, 1901. IIYMENOPTERA ACULEATA OF SUFFOLK. 13Y THE llEV. J. II. HOCKING, M.A.., F.E.S. . xlfter forty years of jn'etty continuous work in India and at home at Lcpidopfera, I have, during 1899 and 1900 been devoting my leisure time to collecting the Ilymenoptera and Dlptera of Suffolk. During this time I have taken of Hi/nienoptcra AcuJenta 33 species of Fossores, 10 of Diploptera, and 96 of Aiithophila ; or 139 of the 2S2 species in the Suffolk list. I am indebted for most kind help in naming the species to the llev. E. N. Bloomfield of Guestling, Mr. Harwood of Colchester, and to Mr. E. Saunders, who has finally identified all doubtful specimens. Sphecodes riibicuiidiis, Halictus zoindits, II. breviceps, Nomada sexfasciata, and Andrena Hattorjiana are additions to the last Suffolk list as published iii 1899. At present I have not touclied the Heterogyna. The following is a list of the less common species which were all, e.\cept where otherwise stated, taken at Copdock, that is, within a radius of about three miles. Fossores : Myrmosa melanocephala, F. Sapyga quinquepunctata , F. Pum- pilus rufipes, L. (Hellesley) ; P. spissus, Sehiodte ; P. chalybeaitis, SchiOdte (Hellesley). Sdlius fuscus, Linn. Agenia hircana, Fab. Ammophila sabulosa, Linn. Diodontus tristis, v. de Lind. Passaloecus corniger, Shuck. Gorytes mys- taceus, Linn. Nyssoii spinosus, Fab. Cerceris inter rupta, Panz. ; C. labiata, Fab. Crabro capitosus, Shuck. ; C. podagricus, r. de Lind. ; C. chrysostomus, Lep. ; C. interruptus, De Greer. DiPLOPTEEA : all the Vespida: (excepting /'. rufa, Linn., V. anstriaca,T&\Yi., and V. norvegica, Fab.). Odynerus spinipea, Linn. ; 0. trifasciatus, Oliv. ; O. parietinus, Linn. ; O. gracilis, Bi'ullo ; O. siniiatus, Fab. AnthophilA: Colleies picistigma, Thoius. Prosopis signata, Sra., P. confusa, Nyl. S]}hecodes dimidiatus, v. Hag.; (S. rnbicnndus, v. Hag. Halictus xanthopus, Kirb. ; H. zonulas, Sm. (Hellesley) ; R. minufun, Kirb. ; //. breviceps, E. Saund. Andrena Ifattorfiana, Fab. ; A. Crlil, Schr. ; A. cingulata, Fab. ; A. pilipes, Fab. (both sexes on I'eronica); A. bimaculata, Kirb. ; A. rosce \ai: spinigera, Kirb.; A. I'.iui.] 09 nifida, Foiirc. ; A. angusfiur, Kii-b. ; A. fucala, Siii. ; A. iiigricej/s, Kirb. ; A. chn/so.iceies, Kivh. ; A. proxima, Kirh. ; A. dorsafa, Kirh. Ci/Usa leporiiia, VaMZ. Nomada sexfasciata, Panz. ; N. jacobaa, Panz. Epeolus productus. Thorns. Melecta annata, Panz. Cuetioxys quadridentata, Linn. ; C. rufescens, Lep. Me- gachile maritima, Kirb.; M.circumcincta,Lc\>.; 31. liffnlseca, Kirh. Anthidium manicatum, Linn. Stelis aterrima, Panz. Chelostoma florisomne, Linn. ; C. cam- panularnm, Kirh. Osmia pit icornia, Sm. Eucera lotifficornis, Linn. Anthophora retusa, Linn. ; A. furcata, Va,nz. All the species of Psithyrus. All the species o( JBomhus, excepting B. Smithianm, Jonellus, lapponicus, soroensis, and pomorum. Copflock Rectory, Ipswich : January 8th, 1901. PESCRTPTION OF A NEW SPECIES OF CRUNCECIA (TRICHOPTERA) FROM AUSTRIA. BY KENNETK J. MORTON, F.E.S. The section of the Srricosfovmtido' to which this genus belonc^rg contains insects of highly specialized type, and the sexual dimorphism is usually marlvcd by strilving secondary characters. Mr. McLachlan, in his Mon. Rev. (p. 271) says: "The structure of the insects is especially liable to excessive modification, and generic limitation will possibly be found extremely vague unless a minute generic sub-divi- sion be eft'ected." As a matter of fact, at the time Mr. McLachlan wrote, each of the three European (in the restricted geographical sense) genera was Ivnown with certainty to contain but one species, and although Lepidosioma now stands with two species within its bounds, this is rather the result of toleration than conviction, as the two seem to be little more than forms of one species. It was accordingly very interesting to find amongst some Triclioii- tera sent to me by Dr. Peter Kempny, of Gutenstein, Lower Austria, in 1898, two examples of what appeared to me to be a distinct new species of Gruncecia. The material, although in fairly good condition, I considered inadequate, and I urged Dr. Kempny to find more. In this, I am glad to say, he has been successful, and I now without hesitation proceed to describe the insect as Ceuncecia Kempnyi, «. sp. Blackish, paler beneath. Antennoj nearly uniformly fuscous, traces of anniila- tion being as a rule scarcely perceptible ; basal joint with long dark brownish hairs. Head clothed with dai-k brownish hairs; warts brown, apparently arranged as in C. irrorata. Warts of the pronotum usually paler. Maxillary palpi of tlie $ not examined (they are either broken off or closely appressed in the examples 70 [March, before me); those of tlie V darker tluiii the labial palpi, whieh are yellowish in both sexes. Legs testaceous, but partly fuscesceiit; eoxie fuseous. Anal parts yellowish. Wings with the ncuration similar to that of C. irrorata ; iridescent; fore-wings with blackish pubescence ; long silky fringes of the hind-wings more greyish. In the 3 the anal parts consist of a large broad dorsal plate, the posterior part of which is narrower than the basal, and the hind angles are each provided with two strong spines ; seen from above the breadth of the posterior part of the plate and the position of the spines vary a little from the results of drying. From be- 2- neath this plate escapes the large down - turned penis, which, seen from above, seems to have two approximated piceous ridges which open in front, causing the apex to appear excised. The inferior appendages are large and prominent; view- ed from beneath they consist of a basal part which has towards its inner margin a more strongly chitinized band, which seems to be turned abruptly outwards ; after nar- rowing slightly they turn outwards into a large foliaceous expansion, the hind margin of which is excised, and the outer portion of this expansion is in turn recurved towards the abdomen. From the inner angle, or lobe, of the excised hind margin, viewed from above, springs a long and strong spine directed outwards, and from the outer margin of (he foliaceous expansion arises a much smaller spine directed forwards. The $ has the anal parts very much as in C. irrorata. Expanse of wings, IH — 13 mm. Compared with C. irrornia this new species is an altogether much darker looking insect, and the golden pubescence of the former insect is entirely absent. The costal fringe seems also to be less dense than in irrorata, and so do the pubescence of the membrane and the hairs of the basal joint of the antennse, but the material is not in a condition so perfect as are the examples of irrorata used in com- parison. As all the examples of Cruncccia in Mr. McLachlan's collection 1901.] 71 from uiiuiy localities in the more western parts of Europe are C. irrorafti, the distribntion of this new species will in all likelihood prove to be more or less oriental. But these insects are unobtrusive, and must often be passed over in districts where they are bound to EXPLANATION OF FIQUEES. 1. Apex of abdomen from side. 2. Inferior appendages from beneath. 3. Apex of abdomen from above (moi'e enlarged). 13, Blackford Road, Edinburgh : December, 1900. DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIRS OF CICADID^ FROM THE BAHAMA ISLANDS. BY W^ L. DISTANT, V.P.E.S. Mr. J. L. Bonhote has given me five specimens, three (^ and two ? , of a Cicada he captured at Nassau, a species which requires description. Cicada Boniiotei, sp. n. (J . Body above dark fuscous, ochraceously pilose ; eyes, anterior margins— narrowly — and latei'al and posterior margins of pronotum, margins of two obconical basal spots to mesonotum, and the cruciform elevation brownish-ochraceous ; a transverse metanotal fascia, the lateral margins of the penultimate and the whole of the apical segment of the abdomen cretaceous-white ; a dark fuscous irregular suffusion on the lateral areas of the pronotal margins. Body beneath fuscous ; head sternum, and lateral margins of abdomen cretaceous-white ; rostrum, femora, and opercula ochraceous ; tibiaj olivaceous ; apical half of rostrum, apices of the tibia3 and tarsi, and basal inner margins of opercula, piceous. Tegmina and wings pale hyaline, the venation olivaceous on basal half, but becoming fuscous towards apex; tegmina with the inner basal area and the transverse veins at bases of second and third apical areas, infuseated. ? . Body paler above where the cretaceous-white markings are absent, though present beneath. The face is broadly tumid, centrally broadly sulcate, with the transverse stria- tions very strongly developed ; in the c? the opercula are triangular, their lateral margins very slightly convex, their inner margins oblique, tlieir apices subacute and reaching the second abdominal segment ; the pronotum has a broad transverse foveate impression at its anterior margin, and the usual incisures are profound. Long., excl. tegm., (J and $ , 34 to 35 millim. Exp. tegm., 95 to 100 millini. Hub. : Bahama Islands, Nassau {J. L. Bonhote). Warlingham, Surrey : January, 19ul. IJ2 [March, Aculeate Humenupterd in Norlh IValtn. — On July Jtli, IDOO, I again visited Criccieth, and during my stay thi'i-c was able to add the following insects to my list of captures, published on page 62, vol. xi, 1900 : — PompUus chalybeatus, Schiodte, Ceropales maculaius,Ya.h., Astata sti/jma, Panz., Diodontus minidus, Yfih., tristis, V. de Lind, Mlmesa bicolor. Fab., unicolor, v. de Lind, Gorytes tumidus, Panz., Cerceris arenaria, Linn., Crahro Wesmaeli, v. de Lind, cribrarius, Linn., Oxybelus mucronatus. Fab., Odi/nerus picttis, Curt., .limiaiits, Fab., Andrena nigriceps, Kirb., denticuhita, Kirb., Dasypoda hirtipes, Latr., Epeolus rujipes, Thorns., Ccelioxys riifescens, Lep., elongata, Lep., Stelis aterrima, Panz., Osmla xanthomelana, Kirb., fulviventris, Panz., Psithyrus rupestris, Fab., campestris Panz., quadricolor, Lep., Bombiis Smithianus, White, Jonellus, Kirb., soroensis. Fab., var. ? Only ? s were taken of the rare O. xantkomelana, and these were worn, the hairs on the thorax being matted with clay in some cases, showing that they had been busy with their nests. The nests I could not find, though diligent search was made for them. The bees were only noticed on the flowers of Lotus cornicu- latus. Oxybelus mucronatus, and Andrena nigriceps looked very beautiful on the flowers of Eryngium maritimum, though the $ of the former were also taken on Euphorbia paralias. Bombus Smithianus was caught the day before I left, August 8th, and was most conspicuous on the flowers of E. maritimum. Most of the Aculentes mentioned in my former list were again seen, Osmia parietina being very scarce. It makes its colls in the small cavities of a stone that is occasionally used in the field walls. Fompilus approiimatus, Sm., occurred again in its old haunts near the sea, and Nomada Roberjeotiana was observed entering the burrows of Halictus rubicnndus, but their stay was short, possibly owing to the presence of the owners. — E. B. Nevimson, 3, Tedw^rth Square, Chelsea, S.W. : January, 1001. Aculeate ffymenoptera in the New Forest. — On June 4th, 1900, I went to Lyndhurst for a few days and was pleased to capture some (?s of Andrena proximo, Kirb., on the flowers of the rhododendron, also amongst other Aculeafes, Pompilus spissus, Schiodte, Halictus prasinus, Sm., Andrena varians, Eossi, helvola, Linn., and Melecta lucluosa. Scop. I am again indebted to the kindness of Mr. E. Saunders for confirming the identification of several in the above list. — In. Observations on Sphecodes. — I was very much interested in the article by the Kev. F. D. Morice upon Sphecodes begun in the January number of this Magazine, as for a long time I have been struck by the apparent connection between Sphecodes and Andrena, suggesting parasitism on the part of the former. I cannot give any- thing more in the nature of proof, and have no definite notes to refer to upon most of my observations ; but one case which came under my notice seems worth quoting, as being an additional instance, and as supporting Mr. Morice's conclusions strongly. In Sutton Park, out on a bare part of the common, is a little colony of Andrena humilis. It is in rather an isolated spot, simply a few bare sandy places on a grassy slope, with no trees or bushes near, and not a bank in which one would naturally look for any Aculeates which might occur in the neighbourhood. On July 1001.] 73 3rcl, 1898, I visited this to obtain a series of Nomada fern(fjin(ifii, wliicli was rather eoiimuiu with its host, and while watching for these bees to ap])ear noticed several specimens of Sphecodes which were appearing from and disappearing into the holes in the same way as the Nomada. I captured half a dozen, which all proved to be S. uliginosa is very variable and lofal, and I cannot think what the larvse feed upon. I used to live in a house quite in the centre of the town, and then found a considerable number of specimens (always) upon the windows. I have been sixteen years in my present house just outside the town, and have never seen a single specimen." My specimens also were taken upon windows, and although I have not yet proved the fact by breeding the larvae, I have very little doubt about their pabulum being rotten timber and the fungi associated with the same, as the basement of my cottage is badly afl^ected with what is called " dry rot." I also believe it is from the same source I obtain C. sesioides, as they are also found on the windows and walls of the same rooms, and have given instructions that next time any repairs are made the rotten wood is to be saved, and by placing some blocks of it in breeding cages hope to solve this question. In addition to those already mentioned the following species were taken : one Ptychoptera lacustris, Mg. ; four Rhipidia maculaia, Mg. ; one Idioptera pulchella, Mg. ; one Dysmaclius trigonus, Mg. ; two Volucella inanis, L. ; one Prosena siberita, F. ; one Lispe tentaculata, Deg. ; four Norellia spinimana, Fin. ; Amauro- soma fasciata, Mg. (com.); one Tetanocera punctata, F. ; one Liinyiia iiiarginata, F. ; one Dorycera graminiim, F. ; JEnsina sonchi, L., and Tephrites vespertina, Lw. (both com.); three Sapromyza fasciata, Fin.; one Oni.ithomyia avicularia, L., and others. — Fred. C. Adams, 50, Ashley Gardens, S.W. : January, 1901. Two unrecorded British Diptera. — I have specimens of a fly which both my father and myself considered to be the Musca erythrophthal ina figured by Panzer. Mr. Austin, who has seen it, tells me it is Chlorops rufina, Zett. ; they frequent the flowers of Mentha hirsuta in the month of August. The other species is Phytomyza * Since writing the above I have olitained a copy of Mr. Verrall's new work, " Briti.sh Flies (Syrpbidai)," and find M. hvu.